PS1061: Sensation and Perception 2011
Term I, THURSDAY 2-4 pm (WinAud)
Lecture 10: Revision : Making sense of the
world
Course co-ordinator: Johannes M. Zanker,
j.zanker@rhul.ac.uk, (Room W
214)
Lecture Topics
- sensory outfit and ecological niches (sensors co-evolve with
behaviour, with occupation of specific environments)
- super-human senses in the animal kingdom: UV, IR, polarised
light, electricity, magnetism, …
- sensory processing strategies and sensory inegration: cortical
networks
- combining sensory infromation in speech: recognising emotions,
lip reading, cortical processing of sign language, ventrilocism
- classical theories of perception: Gestalt psychology, constructivist
approach, direct perception
- perception as information processing: neuroscience
- Q&A about revision, examination – coursework
feedback
comparing the senses
5 senses (proverbial, Aristotelian
tradition)
|
sense |
vision |
hearing |
touch |
smell |
taste |
|
organ |
eye |
ear |
skin |
nose |
tongue |
|
physical quality of stimuli |
light
electromagnetic wave |
soud
pressure wave |
deformation
physical objects |
odour (scent)
airborne chemicals |
aroma (flavour)
dissolved chemicals |
- perhaps a better physical classification: electromagnetic, mechanical,
chemical stimuli
- are these all channels of sensory input?
- what about temperature, pain? other senses?
Super(?)-human senses
 |
why don’t we have X-ray vision ?
who has ?
|
the limitations of human sensory systems
can best be demonstrated by looking at the ‘sensory ecology’ - in
their particular habitats, animals have developed during evolution senses which
are unknown to humans
The Ecology of Ultraviolet Vision in Birds & Insects
UV light (wavelength < 400nm) exposure can have immediate and/or long term
effects on human eyes.
Photokeratitis
: something like a painful sunburn on the front surface of the eyes (snow blindness)
many animals, however, use UV vision (and use protective screening mechanisms
in the retina to protect against damage)
>> birds
see the world in a very different way to humans !!!
|
|
|
the ability to detect UV light
affects their behaviour
recognition of plumage patterns that is invisible to humans |
|
this ability is used in communication,
in particular mating systems
(Bennett
et al. 1996)
|
in this context, various theories based on co-evolution are developed concerning
animal and plant coloration (mimicry, fruit colours
etc.)
similar abilities in many insects, which is important for them in the context
of food selection and orientation:
for example, this honey
bee is homing in on a colt's foot (Tussilago farfara L.) flower (which appears
just as brigth yellow to the human eye);
the bee is guided through the prominent UV colour patterns to the centre of
the flower head
the flower is usingthis pattern as advertising sign, because it needs the bee
to transport its pollen
we find the same story underwater, where
UV can help to counteract poor lighting conditions:
|
In normal daylight, these two species of Damsel
fish, Pomacentrus amboinensis and Pomacentrus moluccensis,
appear plain yellow, and are difficult to distinguish
|
|
In bright UV light, using a UV sensitive camera, and
to any animal with UV vision, these two species show very distinct
facial patterns
(by courtesy of Uli
Siebeck, Brisbane)
|
some interesting adaptations to underwater vision can be found in humans,
as well, but no UV sensitivty!
The Visual Ecology of Polarized Light
many animals, particularly invertebrates, are sensitive
to the plane of polarized light (preferred orientation
of electromagnetic waves)
– humans are completely blind to this property !
this provides these animals with an extra dimension of visual information: functional
significance poorly understood
example : dungbeetles
|
living on firm coastal sands in burrows, the dung beetle
returns to the burrow along the shortest possible route from extended
foraging trips; in this environment visual landmarks are scarce
>> they rely on cues in the sky to find way back, using polarisation-sensitive
photoreceptors in the dorsal parts of their eyes (see also Dacke
et al. 1999)
|
 |
what do humans do?
| humans use tools, such as sports
sunglasses : advanced multi-layer lens technology in polarising
sun glasses, eliminating surface glare and reducing unwanted reflections
(fishing!) |
|
Infrared Vision
rattlesnakes
and other pit vipers are visualising heat !
|
- heat-sensing pits behind each nostril
- highly effective in detecting differences in temperature
at large distances (meters)
- crucial for hunting of warm-blooded animals
in the dark and as protection against large predators!
- integrated with visual images in the brain
(Newman & Hartline 1982) |
|
and humans?
humas again need tools, for example: Thermal
Imaging cameras that are often used to detect insulation, electrical
and mechanical problems, as indicated by heat loss ...
(here: a thermal image of a dog)
|
|
this technology is used in particular for night
vision equipment !!!
Sensing magnetic fields
humans are also using tools to exploit the magnet field of the earth
for navigation purposes :
compass (magnetic needle passively orienting parallel to magnetic field)
|
|
navigating birds have been demonstrated to use the earth magnetic
field for orientation on their extended journeys
(thousands of miles) |
little is known about the location and function of magnetic sensors
& the strategies to exploit such signals |
other suspects for the use of magnetic information:
Electric field
some fish can generate electric fields
(electrogenic) and/or detect electric fields (electroreceptive)
which are used for active or passive orientation mechanisms: electrolocation
|
|
- variety of location of the electric organ
and of the waveform of the electric
organ discharge
|
(see Nelson & MacIver 1999)
|
Apteronotus albifrons
(black ghost knifefish) |
| electrolocation
is also known for the Australian Platypus
|
|
Echolocation in Humans
bats are known to use echo signals to fly in the dark >> humans?
a California teenager who is blind and overcomes his disability by experiencing
life with all his other senses...

|
| http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/06/eveningnews/main1977730.shtml |
Sensory processing strategies
- senses and behaviour match ecological niches
- active exploration gives access to richer information
- combination of senses: improves sensitivity and selectivity >>>
sensory integration
>>> sensory integration
how can cross-modal combination of information be investigated
experimentally ?
(an example for vision-touch integration: recognise objects by vision
and/or haptics)
|
 |
(large interest from engineering: sensory
fusion in robots, VR, video games) >> how do nervous
systems combine sensory information ?
Multisensory regions in the human brain
how and where are the different senses integrated
in the human brain ?
fMRI is the tool to study some cases of multisensory integration: most prominent
:
combination of visual and auditory information (Calvert et al 1998)
- red: viewing mouth movements without
sound
- blue: listening to speech
- yellow: activated by both signals
these could be the regions for crossmodal identification
!
Audio-visual speech integration
one step further – conjunction: is coherence
between visual AND auditory information crucial?
what happens in the multisensory brain regions when listeners receive
conflicting signals (McGurk Effect) ? (seeing someone saying
'ga' while listening to sound 'ba' leads to perception of 'da')
(King and Calvert 2001)
|
 |
Encoding of sign language
- how the deaf process signed
languages in the brain ?
- specialised structures for decoding
linguistic patterns in general?
example
for sign language: butterfly

positron emission tomography (PET)
scans in congenitally deaf people
(Nishimura
et al 1999) |
|
|
- yellow: sign language >>
upper regions of temporal lobe (encodes hearing, spoken language)
- blue: vision (video of meaningless
hand movements) >> early visual cortex
- green: audition (cochlear implant)
>> primary auditory cortex
|
additional evidence: PET brain scans of 11 profoundly deaf people and 10 hearing
people (Petitto & Zatorre 2000)
 |
what is the cortical location for language error handling
?
- signed sentences mostly encoded in left hemisphere (like
parsing spoken language hearing people)
- identical brain structures for similar tasks in the left inferior
frontal cortex in deaf and hearing people
- meaningless grammatical hand movements >> greater
blood flow in the planum temporale (like spoken equivalent in hearing
people)
|
reading emotions
observers are asked to rate the sadness of a series of (real) faces with different
expressions between happy and sad
 |
sadness ratings follow a ‘psychometric curve’:
from low to high for happy to sad faces
combining the face display with a sad or happy voice shifts
the psychometric curve to higher or lower sadness ratings
|
emotional voices influence the categorization
of facial expression !!
(De Gelder & Bertelson 2003)
for some more intersting observations about about facial expressions click
here ...
transfer across sensory modalities
ventriloquism:
speaking or uttering sounds so that they seem to come from the speaker’s
dummy or some other source than the speaker
for some nice moves, click here
for 'read my lips'
|
 |
  |
synaesthesia:
a mixing of senses causing a person to experience such things as colored
hearing, gustatory sights, and auditory smells…
(one in every 25,000 people !)
(Ramachandran & Hubbard 2003)
|
sensory substitution: replacing a (lost/missing) sense
with some other sense!
the vOICe
system translates arbitrary video images into sounds -
this means that you can see with your ears, whenever you want to
|
|
an interesting case
study (on YouTube)...
(see also Stoffregen TA, Pittenger JB 1995)
Human
echolocation : see a California teenager who is blind overcome
his disability by experiencing life with all his other senses...
Theories of Perception
Gestalt psychology
Gestalt theory has its focus on the principles
of perceptual organisation: ‘the whole is more than the
sum of the parts’
‘laws’ describing perceptual phenomena <<you may want to ask
yourself: are these explanations?>>
(Wertheimer, Koffka,
Kohler)
constructivist approach
emphasizing top-down processes in perception:
the mind tries to make the best sense of ambiguous data
(Neisser, Gregory)
direct perception
emphasizing bottom-up processing,
exploiting richness of information content in sensory data
direct use of sensory input for behavioural control without need of high-level
representation
(Gibson)
the information processing approach
in these lectures the focus was on a neuroscientific
& computational approach to perception, which describes
the first information processing steps as basis for cognitive psychology
common themes for all 5 major sensory channels are the following key concepts:
- receptor: transformation from
external to neural signals
- filter: encoding of information,
tuning to specific properties
- receptive field: physiological
basis for localisation and tuning
- representation: cortical processing
and mapping
- illusions: processing can
misrepresent the physical world
- active sensing: sensory system
link with exploratory behaviour
how does this approach relate to other concepts
of perception?
summary: integration & conceptual framework
- humans rely on a variety of senses
to organise their behaviour
- many animals have sensory systems that
are not available to humans - adaptation to specific environments
and behavioural strategies
- different types of sensory information is integrated
in the human brain (audio-visual binding is important for
understanding language)
- ‘classical’ approaches
to understand human perception include Gestalt, constructivist
and direct perception
- the currently dominating view
focuses on information processing in biological
systems (~cognitive psychology)
some things to remember about revision and exams
Reading:
- Zanker, J.M. (2010) Sensation,
Perception, Action - an evolutionary perspective. Palgrave (152.1 ZAN)
: chapters 12 and 13
- Goldstein, EB (2002) Sensation
and Perception (7th ed.), Wadsworth (152.1 GOL)
- Eysenck (2001) Principles of Cognitive Psychology.
Psychology Press (153.4 EYS) chapter 2 for conceptual frameworks
Specific References:
- Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC & Maier EJ. (1996) "Ultraviolet
vision and mate choice in zebra finches." Nature 380, 433-435, click
here (download from Journal)
- Calvert, G A, Brammer, M J, Iversen, S D 1998 "Crossmodal identification"
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 247-253, click here (download
from Journal)
- Dacke M, Nilsson D-E, Warrant EJ, Blest AD, Land MF& O´Carroll
DC (1999) "Built-in polarizers form part of a compass organ in spiders"
Nature 401, 470-473
- de Gelder B, Bertelson P (2003) "Multisensory integration,
perception and ecological validity." TICS 7(10), 460-476. click here
(download from Journal)
- Kanizsa G (1976) "Subjective Contours" Scient.Am. 234,
48-52. click here (download from virtual resources)
- Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale,
New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- King, AJ, Calvert, GA 2001 "Multisensory integration: Perceptual
grouping by eye and ear" Current Biology 11, R322-R325. click
here (download from Journal)
- Land, MF, Nilsson D-E (2002) Animal Eyes. Oxford: Oxford University
Press
- Marr D (1982) Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation
and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: Freeman & Co.
- Moller, P. (1995). Electric Fishes: History and Behavior. London: Chapman
& Hall
- Nelson, M.E. and MacIver, M.A. (1999) Prey capture in the weakly electric
fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory
consequences. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 1195-1203
- Newman E, Hartline P (1982) The infrared "vision" of Snakes.
Scientific American 213:116-127. click here (download from virtual resources)
- Nishimura H, Hashikawa K, Doi K, Iwaki T, Watanabe Y, Kusuoka H, Nishimura
T, Kubo T (1999) "Sign language 'heard' in the auditory cortex" Nature
397, 116
- Petitto LA, Zatorre RJ, Gauna K, Nikelski EJ, Dostie D, Evans AC (2000)
"Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed
languages: Implications for the neural basis of human language" PNAS 97, 13961–13966
- Ramachandran VS, Hubbard EM (2003) "Hearing colours, tasting
shapes" Scientific American, 288(5): 52-9. click here (download from
virtual resources)
- Siebeck U E, 2004 "Communication in coral reef fish: the role
of ultraviolet colour patterns in damselfish territorial behaviour" Animal
Behaviour 68 273-282. click here (download from virtual resources)
- Stoffregen TA, Pittenger JB (1995) "Human Echolocation as a
Basic Form of Perception and Action" Ecological Psychology, Vol. 7(3),
181-216. click here (download from virtual resources)
to download a pdf copy of lecture summary, click
here
to download a pdf copy of lecture slides, click
here
back to course
outline
last update
30-01-2012
Johannes
M. Zanker